LLM-Orchestrated Research Workflow
Beyond quantitative research, Zeto includes a governed LLM orchestration layer for research planning, context engineering, evidence-grounded review, and experiment evolution. Natural-language requests are transformed into structured research actions, connected to deterministic diagnostics, and reviewed through provenance-aware AI workflows. The system is intentionally human-controlled: experiment execution remains separate from AI reasoning, ensuring reproducibility, auditability, and clear governance boundaries throughout the research lifecycle.
Five architecture layers — from research intent to governed execution to evidence-grounded AI review.
Natural language or structured request from researcher
Parse and classify intent into typed workflow actions
Select tools, data, configurations, and review strategy
Generate candidate experiment configuration draft
Researcher reviews draft, compares, and validates intent
Final approved configuration is persisted
Explicit human control before any execution is initiated. The LLM cannot run experiments or bypass approval.
Quant research platform executes the approved configuration
Metrics, diagnostics, plots, configs, and metadata are generated
Relevant artefacts, diagnostics, metadata, plots, and lineage assembled into structured context
Deterministically detect and flag issues before LLM review
Review, comparison, and synthesis using structured evidence
Reviews, decisions, and insights linked into lineage and stored for future use
End-to-end walkthrough from research request to evidence-grounded review and research evolution.
Intent Routing
Natural-language research requests are converted into typed workflow actions before planning and review occur.
Context Engineering
Research artefacts are transformed into structured context containing diagnostics, metadata, plots, and failure modes before any LLM interaction.
Governed AI Review
Deterministic evidence is assembled before interpretation, ensuring reviews remain traceable, reproducible, and evidence-grounded.
Research Memory
Reviews, proposals, lineage records, and evolution chains preserve research state across iterations.
- LLM output is advisory
- Human approval required
- No autonomous experiment execution
- Quant engine remains source of truth
- Failure modes detected deterministically
- Reviews linked to persisted artefacts